TABLE OF CONTENTS
Highlights
Introduction
Overall Gambling Participation
The Demographics of Northeastern Gamblers
Charitable Gambling/Lottery Sales
History of Gambling Participation
- Indian Casinos
- Non-Indian Casinos
- Minnesota State Lottery
- Other Lottery
- Cards
- Dice
- Dog Racing
- Social Bets
- Horse Racing
- Pulltabs
- Sports Events
- Bingo
Methodology
HIGHLIGHTS
The overall participation rate in Northwestern Minnesota has increased
gradually from 82 percent in 1993 to 88 percent in 1997, but is currently
consistent with the state's overall gambling participation rate of 89
percent. Residents of Northwestern Minnesota and those of the rest of
the state resemble each other in their gambling habits ( both groups
have wagered on an average of four gambling activities during their
lifetimes.
Lottery play (both Minnesota Lottery and other lotteries) is a less
popular recent activity for Northwesterners than for the state populace
as a whole. Seniors living in Northwestern Minnesota are less likely
to have gambled recently than seniors living throughout the state.
Northwesterners without a high school diploma are the least likely
to have gambled during their lifetime.
Lifetime gambling preferences for Northwestern men are predominately
similar to those of men statewide, but Northwestern women reflect the
overall state female participation rates in only five of the 13 gambling
activities.
INTRODUCTION
The 20 counties depicted on the cover of this report represent what
will be referred to as Northwestern Minnesota. The largest of Minnesota's
six regions geographically, it is home to four of the state's 16 Indian-owned
casinos, 370 licensed charitable gambling locations and 401 Minnesota
State Lottery retailers. In addition, residents may indulge in social
wagering at informal card games, take part in office Super Bowl pools
or even leave the region to attend a horse race in Canada or play blackjack
in North Dakota.
But how does the gambling activity in this area compare to the rest
of the state? Are Northwesterners more likely to gamble than other Minnesotans?
Do they prefer the same activities?
These and other questions were addressed in a survey designed by the
Minnesota State Lottery with the assistance of the Survey Research Center
at St. Cloud State University. The Survey Research Center designed the
sample and conducted the interviews. Lottery staff completed the data
analysis and report writing.
About 2,400 interviews were conducted statewide; 390 responses came
from Northwestern Minnesota. Sixty-seven percent of the households contacted
completed the survey.1 Respondents were asked if they had participated
in any of 13 different forms of gambling and whether they made wagers
on each of those activities during the past year.
The design, methodology and many of the survey's questions were replicated
from phone interviews conducted in the early summers of 1993, 1995 and
1996. This report uses data from these earlier projects to see how gambling
behavior in Northwestern Minnesota adults has changed in recent years.
It also compares activity in Northwestern Minnesota with state participation
rates.
OVERALL GAMBLING PARTICIPATION
Eighty-eight percent of Northwestern Minnesota adults report having
gambled sometime during their lives (that's about 216,000 of the 246,000
adults living in the region). The overall participation rate has increased
gradually from 82 percent in 1993 but is currently consistent with the
state's overall gambling participation rate of 89 percent found both
in 1996 and in 1997.[2] Gambling during the past year by Northwestern
Minnesotans is comparable to the state's participation rate of 72 percent
of adults.
The number of gambling activities played by Northwestern Minnesota
adults is similar to the state's overall activity. The average adult
in both populations has bet on four of 13 specific gambling activities
in his or her lifetime. The average Minnesota adult has participated
in two of the 13 gambling activities during the last year; a typical
Northwestern adult has participated in one.
The Minnesota State Lottery and pulltabs are the most popular forms
of gambling in Northwestern Minnesota and the state as a whole. Northwesterners
are by far less likely to have wagered on a horse race or to have purchased
an out-of-state lottery ticket in their lifetime than are adults living
throughout the state most likely because of the distance to the nearest
horse track (Winnipeg) and the lack of a lottery in neighboring North
Dakota. Cards, non-Indian casinos, sports events and dog racing are
also less popular activities in Northwestern Minnesota than in the state
overall.
When we consider only recent experience we find that the Minnesota
State Lottery remains the most popular form of gambling. Forty-three
percent of the adults in Northwestern Minnesota and nearly half of the
adults throughout the state have played the Lottery during the last
year. However, lottery play (both Minnesota Lottery and other lotteries)
is a less popular activity for Northwesterners than for the state populace
as a whole.
Slots/video ranks the highest as the favorite form of gambling in both
Northwestern Minnesota and throughout the state for those having a gambling
preference. Northwesterners tend to favor blackjack and bingo more often
than does an average Minnesotan. Lotteries are favored more by adults
living throughout the state than by those living in the Northwestern
portion of the state.
THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF NORTHWESTERN GAMBLERS
There is very little difference in gambling participation rates between
Northwestern Minnesota and the state overall for those under 45. Gambling
is least popular for those 65 and older and even more so for those adults
living in Northwestern Minnesota.
Gambling behavior within the past year by Northwesterners under the
age of 35 is similar to the state's participation rates. However, Northwestern
Minnesota shows increasing participation rates (from 68 percent in the
35-44 age group to 77 percent in the 55-64 age group), whereas the state
remains stable at 73-74 percent for those between the ages of 35 and
64. Both groups show a considerable decline in recent participation
for those 65 and older and the decline is even more significant for
seniors living in Northwestern Minnesota. Seniors living in Northwestern
Minnesota are less likely to have gambled recently than seniors living
throughout the state.
Northwesterners without a high school diploma are the least likely
to have gambled during their lifetime. All other categories hover around
the state's lifetime gambling participation rate of 89 percent, suggesting
that education has minimal influence on overall gambling participation
rates both in Northwestern Minnesota and throughout the state.
Lifetime gambling preferences for Northwestern men are predominately
similar to those of men throughout the state. Northwestern men are less
likely to have played the lottery (especially lotteries outside of Minnesota),
bet on a horse race or wagered on card games during their lifetime than
the state male populace as a whole. However, a Northwestern man is more
likely to have gambled on dice than a typical Minnesotan man.
A Northwestern Minnesota woman is just as likely to have gambled during
her lifetime as any Minnesotan woman. Overall participation rates for
each of the groups are very similar at 86 and 85 percent, but their
category specific participation rates reflect state rates for less than
half of the gambling activities. Northwestern Minnesota women are by
far less likely to have bet on a dog race, horse race or a sports event
than are women statewide.
CHARITABLE GAMBLING/LOTTERY SALES
In addition to a state-run Lottery, Minnesota also licenses nonprofit
organizations, giving them the right to sell pulltabs and tipboards,
and run bingo games, raffles and paddlewheels. The Gambling Control
Board oversees these lawful gambling activities, which raise money for
various charities throughout the state. Charitable gambling sales exceeded
$1.3 billion in fiscal year 1997, three-and-a-half times higher than
the state's Lottery sales of $370 million. Pulltabs remain the most
popular of the five types of charitable gambling activities, grossing
more than $1.2 billion in FY97.
Northwestern Minnesota, with 8 percent of the state's population, accounted
for approximately 10 percent ($139 million) of state charitable gambling
sales and 9 percent ($32 million) of Lottery sales.
The top six of the 20 counties in the region (Otter Tail through Beltrami)
contributed 67 percent (92.7 million) of charitable gambling sales and
73 percent (23.2 million) of Lottery sales in Northwestern Minnesota.
Lottery sales were slightly higher than charitable gambling sales in
Wilkin and Mahnomen counties. Wilkin County has two charitable gambling
locations and Mahnomen County has only one in comparison with respectively
7 and 8 Lottery retail locations.
Although charitable gambling and Lottery sales differ greatly in volume
from each other and from county to county (with the exception of Clay
County), there is similarity in the proportion of total regional sales
contributed by each of the Northwestern counties. Clay County shows
a much higher percentage of regional lottery sales (18 percent) than
charitable gambling sales (9 percent), which is attributable to Lottery
purchases by North Dakota residents. It is estimated that North Dakotan's
contribute roughly $5 million per year to the Minnesota State Lottery.[3]
Moorhead, Minnesota has three of the top 15 Lottery retailers statewide
and four of the top 10 Numbers games retailers statewide.
County populations, as a percentage of the region, are also fairly
consistent with charitable gambling and Lottery sales. Polk County shows
the largest discrepancy in this regard with 9 percent of the population
contributing 14 percent of both regional charitable gambling and Lottery
sales. This seemingly high level of gambling activity is probably attributable
to gambling by Grand Forks area North Dakotans. East Grand Forks (in
Polk County) has three Lottery retailers in the top 50 statewide, all
of which are in the top 30 for Numbers games sales. The flooding in
1997 may have had an effect on sales; in previous years several East
Grand Forks retailers have been among the Lottery's top 10.
The following charts depict gambling participation of Northwesterners
from 1993 through 1997. They show current and lifetime participation
rates for 12 of the 13 specific gambling activities discussed in this
report.[4]
HISTORY OF GAMBLING PARTICIPATION
METHODOLOGY
During June and July 1997, the Minnesota State Lottery contracted with
the St. Cloud State University Survey for a telephone survey of Minnesota
adults. The SCSU Survey is an ongoing survey research arm of the Social
Science Research Institute in the College of Social Sciences at St.
Cloud State University. The questionnaire was designed by the Minnesota
State Lottery and modified in consultation with the SCSU Survey directors.
The survey director is Dr. Steve Frank, SCSU Professor of Political
Science. Dr. Frank is a member of the Midwest Association for Public
Opinion Research and the American Association for Public Opinion Research
and subscribes to the code of ethics of the AAPOR. Dan Olson served
as the interviewer supervisor. About 20 trained, supervised and paid
SCSU students conducted the actual interviews using a computer-assisted
telephone interviewing (CATI) system. They were monitored by Olson and
Frank. All calls were made from the SCSU Survey Research Laboratory.
Callers were identified as being from St. Cloud State University. The
survey was administered between June 8 and July 15. The instrument was
pre-tested by SCSU Survey prior to the start of the phone calling.
The target population was surveyed using a stratified random sample
scheme. According to this scheme, the state was divided into six geographic
areas corresponding to Lottery sales regions and a goal was set to obtain
400 completed responses within each region. Several steps were taken
to ensure that the telephone samples of each region's adults 18 or older
was representative of each area's larger population. Households were
contacted using random digit dialing, a technique that can reach changed,
new and unlisted phone numbers (samples from phone books may skip 30
percent or more of area households). The random digit sample for each
region was prepared by Survey Sampling, Inc., of Fairfield, Connecticut.
Within each household the particular respondent was determined in a
statistically unbiased fashion using the Hagen-Collier method.5 This
method seeks to eliminate statistical bias by alternating between men
and women and older and younger respondents. Few substitutions were
allowed. Hard-to-reach respondents were called up to seven times over
different days and times, and appointments were made as necessary to
interview the designated respondent at his or her convenience. Calls
were made primarily after 4:30 p.m. and on weekends, but calls were
also made during weekdays in order to reach hard-to-get respondents.
Each regional sample consisted of about 400 completed interviews for
an estimated sample error for each area of (+/-) 5 percent at the 95
percent level of confidence. This means that if one were to have drawn
20 samples of each region and administered the same instrument, it would
be expected that the overall findings would be greater or less than
5 percent only one time in 20. The sample error for all regions combined
and weighted for statewide analysis is approximately (+/-) 2 percent.
As with all sample surveys, however, there are other possible sources
of error for which precise estimates cannot be calculated. For sub-samples
such as age and gender, the sample error may be larger.
The completion rate of the survey is 67 percent, which is at least
10 percentage points above the average for professional marketing firms
and reverses a slight decline over the past three years. Completion
rate means that once an eligible household was reached, about two-thirds
of the respondents agreed to participate in the survey. With a few exceptions,
partial surveys were not counted as complete. The upward tick is due
to better training, better use of the CATI system and more attempts
to convert some initial refusals. A total of 2,396 interviews were completed.
The demographics of each sample appear to match census and other known
characteristics of each region very well. As is characteristic of telephone
surveys, women were slightly over-sampled; results are weighted to compensate
for this.
Analysis of the data was completed by the Minnesota State Lottery research
department using the SPSS statistical analysis computer package. Before
analysis, each response was assigned a statistical weight based on 1995
population estimates from the State Demographer's office to compensate
for the different population sizes of each region and the oversampling
of women.6 Information in this report was compiled by Lottery Research
Analyst Colette Hanson under the supervision of Don Feeney, Research
and Planning Director for the Lottery. Feeney holds a Master of Science
degree in statistics and is a member of the American Association for
Public Opinion Research, the American Statistical Association and its
section on Survey Research Methods.
[1] With a sample of this size, the estimated sample error statewide
is approximately plus or minus 2 percent at the 95 percent level of
confidence; if one were to draw repeated samples of the same size and
administer the same survey, the findings would differ by more than 2
percent only one time in 20. For Northwestern Minnesota the estimated
sample error is approximately plus or minus 5 percent at the 95 percent
level of confidence.
[2] See Gambling in Minnesota, Report 1: Gambling Participation Rates
of Minnesota Adults: 1997 for state detail.
[3] Based on 410 winners of major prizes from North Dakota, inception
through July 31, 1997, which account for 1.4 percent of total major
prize winners for the same time period. Multiplying 1.4 percent by $369
million (total Lottery sales for fiscal year 1997 gives a rough estimate
of $5 million.
[4] The riverboats/cruises category was first included in the 1997
survey and as such has insufficient history for charting.
[5] For further information on the Hagen-Collier method and other methods
of respondent selection, see Lavrakas, Paul J. Telephone Survey Methods:
Sampling, Selection, and Supervision, Sage Publications, Newbury Park,
CA, 1987.
[6] For a detailed discussion of stratified random sampling and weighting
see Cochran, William G., Sampling Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1977.
|